3-D Printers vs. European Guns Laws

OCTOBER 21, 2013

The Liberator hand gun's files were downloaded 100,000 times in 2 days

The gun fired four shots into a gelatin block,” writes The New York Times (Oct. 18, 2013). Each nine-millimeter bullet punched deep into the substance, which was meant to mimic the density of a human body. For the experts at the Austrian Interior Ministry performing the test, it was a clear sign: This was a deadly weapon. But it was no ordinary gun. The officials had downloaded the gun’s digital blueprints from the Internet and “printed” the weapon on a type of 3-D printer that any person could buy online for about $1,360. It took the Austrian authorities $68 worth of plastic polymer, built up layer by layer according to the software instructions, to make the gun.

Law enforcement agencies across Europe are on alert over the proliferation of gun-making software that is easily found on the Internet and can be used to make a weapon on a consumer-grade 3-D printer. In May, after a 25-year-old law student from Texas posted designs for a 3-D-printed handgun online, the files were downloaded more than 100,000 times in just 2 days before the State Department demanded they be removed. Stoking the anxiety have been well-publicized examples in recent months of people evading airport-style security scanners with 3-D-printed plastic weapons, whose only metal components are firing pins no bigger than a short common nail. Last summer, an Israeli TV reporter successfully toted a 3-D-made handgun into the Israeli parliament, where Prime Minister Netanyahu was giving an address.

The manufacture of weapons using 3-D printers is already banned by a European Union directive to member nations. Enforcing that rule, however, may prove a challenge. A total of 35,508 personal printers were sold worldwide last year, up nearly 50% from 2011. Most of these machines were sold to hobbyists, engineering students, and colleges. Tightening airport security might be one possible response, according to the German Police Union. “It is quite conceivable that this technical development will make full-body scanners at airports mandatory.”

This post provided courtesy of Jay and Barry’s OM Blog at www.heizerrenderom.wordpress.comProfessors Jay Heizer and Barry Render are authors of Operations Management , the world’s top selling textbook in its field, published by Pearson.

 

Eiji Toyoda’s Death at Age 100

SEPTEMBER 19, 2013

Eiji  Toyoda at NUMMI California plant in 1985

Eiji Toyoda, a member of Toyota Motor’s founding family and architect of its “lean manufacturing” method that helped turn the automaker into a global powerhouse, died this week in Toyota City, at age 100. “Toyoda,” writes The New York Times(Sept. 18, 2013), “changed the face of modern manufacturing.”

Toyoda is said to have developed an uncanny ability to spot waste. “Problems are rolling all around in front of your eyes,” Mr. Toyoda once said. “Whether you pick them up and treat them as problems is a matter of habit. If you have the habit, then you can do whatever you have a mind to.”

In 1950, he set out on a 3-month tour to survey Ford’s plant in Detroit, then the largest and most efficient factory in the world. That year, Toyota had produced just 2,685 automobiles, compared with the 7,000 vehicles the Ford plant was rolling out in a single day. Mr. Toyoda was unfazed, bringing back a thick booklet that outlined some of Ford’s quality-control methods; the company translated it into Japanese, changing “Ford” to “Toyota” in all references.

Even as he aggressively expanded production at Toyota, Mr. Toyoda applied a manufacturing culture based on concepts like “kaizen,” a commitment to continuous improvements suggested by the workers themselves, and JIT production, a tireless effort to eliminate waste. Those ideas became a core part of what came to be called the Toyota Production System. “One of the features of the Japanese workers is that they use their brains as well as their hands,” he said in 1986. “Our workers provide 1.5 million suggestions a year, and 95% of them are put to practical use. There is an almost tangible concern for improvement in the air at Toyota.”

The methods Mr. Toyoda nurtured have had global influence, and Toyoda pushed expansion overseas, establishing the company’s joint factory with GM, called NUMMI. There he introduced his lean-production methods as part of a migration of Japanese auto manufacturing the US.

This post provided courtesy of Jay and Barry’s OM Blog at www.heizerrenderom.wordpress.comProfessors Jay Heizer and Barry Render are authors of Operations Management , the world’s top selling textbook in its field, published by Pearson.

Trying to Shutter a French Auto Plant

SEPTEMBER 10, 2013

peugeot plantAt Peugeot’s soon-to-close car factory just north of Paris, writes Barron’s Business (Sept.9, 2013), management is grappling with an ambitious year-end production quota: finding jobs for the factory’s nearly 3,000 workers. This was the promise Peugeot made to win government and union approval for closing the largest French auto plant in 2 decades. The job placement effort, costing $749 million, underscores how expensive and time consuming it is to close even a single factory in Western Europe, when it is politically feasible at all.

Peugeot joins companies, including GM and Ford, that have begun the process of closing plants in Western Europe, where a glut of excess production capacity has made many factories unprofitable. But even though more shutdowns are necessary to adapt to depressed European sales, tough experiences for all 3 car makers may give others pause.

“It can cost a billion euros ($1.31 billion) or more to close a vehicle-assembly plant in Western Europe,” said one expert, who said companies have put off closing plants because of the cost. “That’s not an environment that encourages investment.” (U.S. factory shutdowns were quicker and cheaper to pull off. In the U.S., auto makers culled 24 factories during the 2008 economic meltdown.)

Peugeot has been through a year long wringer, with political obstacles followed by union protests that at times turned violent. In the end, the company agreed to give its workers a package of retraining, job placement and severance benefits that are generous even by French standards. As an example, a dozen auto workers were taking shifts driving a bus in a parking lot to train for future jobs Peugeot has lined up for them at Paris’s transit agency. Peugeot is paying for the $13,000-a-person training. “It is the least they can do,” said one worker.

“The alternative to shutting down capacity is being more flexible with capacity,” said Peugeot’s HR chief.

This post provided courtesy of Jay and Barry’s OM Blog at www.heizerrenderom.wordpress.comProfessors Jay Heizer and Barry Render are authors of Operations Management , the world’s top selling textbook in its field, published by Pearson.